![]() Its not the most clear to read, and the colors are drab and sometimes make it tricky to differentiate what's on screen. CONS: a) I'm not entirely keen on the interface (although I've seen worse). ![]() The PRV, which is where I live when I'm recording, is well laid out and intuitive and has all the tools I regularly use. All very useable and a nice bonus c) Samplitude's built in plugins seem quite nice and do the job pretty well d) Midi editing tools are solid and easy to use. #Samplitude pro x3 no audio to midi full versionSo, this is early days with Samplitude and no doubt I'll have a different perspective after spending more time getting to know it, but for what it is worth, these are my current impressions: PROS: a) Mature and stable, I've had no issues with crashes or bugs of any kind b) Comes with a nice library of samples - synths, pads, full version of Independence, plus cinematic percussion, choir, folks instruments, etc. I'm finding things like signal routing and track bouncing to be challenging in Samplitude. Sonar is still way easier to use for some midi stuff (routing midi audio, bouncing takes, etc), and in a few other areas. ![]() It's audio abilities are outstanding, and so far the midi tools are solid, although it has different ways of doing some things, and its going to take me some time to adjust. It's a very powerful DAW, definitely underrated, as Larry mentioned. I have Samplitude Pro X3, and I've been seriously digging into it over these last few days, since I might was well start with an alternate DAW I own, rather than pay out for one I don't. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |